Your child as pariah
Mon Dec 31, 2007 at 04:35:23 AM PDT
There is going to be a legacy to the present times that our children will have to bear, and I’m not just talking about the many new debts that the Bush administration is leaving them to pay. There is a good chance that our children, when traveling or doing business abroad, will be treated like pariahs. They will be blamed for the way the boomer generation ignored our pollution and turned our backs on developing countries in their time of need. Others will point out that we did it all knowingly, that we knew exactly what we were doing when we decided to turn our backs on them.
Thanks to our weakening of the mileage standards, the miles per gallon declined for 25 years – and there are now twice as many cars on the road because of inadequate investment in public transport.
Because we elected to burn coal and oil for electricity rather than build safer nuclear power plants, we have fueled greenhouse warming, leading to exactly the climate change that our own scientists warned us about, starting in 1956.
Greenland changed my mind
Sat Dec 29, 2007 at 03:50:30 PM PDT
Back in 1968, when I first heard a talk about global warming while visiting the Scripps Institute of Oceanography, almost everyone thought that serious problems were several centuries in the future. That's because no one realized how ravenous the world's appetite for coal and oil would become during a mere 40 years. They also thought that problems would develop slowly. Wrong again.
I tuned into abrupt climate change about 1984, when the Greenland ice cores showed big jumps in temperature and snowfall, stepping up and down in a mere decade but lasting centuries. I worried about global warming setting off another flip but I still didn't revise my notions about a slow time scale for the present greenhouse warming.
Greenland changed my mind. About 2004, the speedup of the Greenland glaciers made a lot of climate scientists revise their notions about how fast things were changing. When the summer earthquakes associated with glacial movement doubled and then redoubled in a mere ten years, it made me feel as if I was standing on shaky ground, that bigger things could happen at any time.
The elevator speech (climate crisis)
Sun Dec 23, 2007 at 06:34:45 AM PDT
From my Dot Earth posting:
A stalled-elevator speech is too improbable, but opportunities for a one-minute speech happen every day so that you can get in practice for a 40-story ride with someone influential:
—–
"Wouldn’t mind the bad weather so much except [time this for elevator liftoff] for that sinking feeling that the climate is shifting fast.
We’ve already had 50 years of more and more wildfires, and on every continent. Same thing for major floods. Probably windstorm damage as well. That’s climate change, not just bad weather moving around.
And it looks as if permanent drought is going to make the poor Mediterranean into a dust bowl. Same thing for Perth, Cape Town, and southern California. The tropics are expanding, just as the earliest climate models said they would.
Get-rich-quick Memo to the Oil Barons
Sat Oct 06, 2007 at 01:39:34 PM PDT
Oil barons really know how to dig holes in the ground. And they need a better place to put their money than trying to confuse the public about how serious global fever has become. I think they are missing a old-fashioned business opportunity, and a giant one at that.
Drilling wells is exactly what deep geothermal energy is all about: drill down 5 km, pressure-fracture the rock down there, then drill another well into the fracture zone.
At that, they are the experts. The other use of this technique, invented at Los Alamos in 1972, is what the oil barons ought to be embracing: Aim for a deep rock layer (say, granite) that is dry but hot. Push water down one well, harvest the steam up the other. Then run an old-fashioned steam turbine to generate electricity for the plug-in hybrids.
Works anywhere on earth, though some places will require fewer or shallower wells. Hot Fractured Rock goes under various names such as heat mining; it's nothing like the traditional geothermal plants situated at hot springs.
In Search of a Clean Gigawatt
Thu Oct 04, 2007 at 08:28:59 AM PDT
I recently stood next to an electrical generator, big enough to power a city the size of Seattle (about 1,000 megawatts, known as a gigawatt). It was surprisingly small, no larger than a classroom with a tall ceiling.
The generator’s spinning shaft could be seen where it connected to the steam turbine, next in line. And backing it up were three more turbines, helping to keep that long shaft spinning at 1,800 revolutions every minute.
The generator doesn’t spin freely because every electrical light and appliance in that gigawatt-sized city is resisting it. It takes a lot of push from the four steam turbines to keep it up to speed. Some power plants create the steam in a boiler heated by burning coal, others by using nuclear fission of uranium-235 to generate the requisite heat. The cleanest method of all is harvesting steam from water sprayed on hot granite a few miles [5 km] underground.
Avoid the Optimal
Wed Oct 03, 2007 at 09:07:54 AM PDT
All sensible species avoid living on the edge. But as the world’s temperature goes up a few degrees in the course of the present century, many will be pushed over.
We humans, if I am to judge from the thermostat settings, prefer room temperatures up in the mid-70s. All species have an environmental temperature that they prefer–but it is always less than the optimal temperature for making a living and raising offspring. Place them somewhere where the temperature is their optimum and they will start looking around for a cooler place.
Why is "cool it" so important?
Don’t Sleep Alone!
Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 09:11:58 PM PDT
My father ran a medium-sized insurance company in Kansas City in my youth and, when we were driving around town, he would point out accidents waiting to happen—say, leaving one’s bicycle sprawled across a path for someone to trip over in the dark. A more subtle form of foresight is playing the percentages—and some improving percentages lead to my suggestion, "Don’t Sleep Alone!"
Young adults mostly die, or become permanently disabled, from accidents. Later in life, heart attacks, cancer, and stroke become more common than accidents. Cancers are insidious but the three others strike without warning. They often require fast treatment to prevent permanent disability or death. How fast is fast?
The future ain't what it used to be.
Sun Sep 30, 2007 at 09:25:42 PM PDT
This aphorism by Yogi Berra, the Baseball Hall of Fame philosopher, used to be a funny example of a tangled arrow of time. But now it means that, thanks to global warming and ocean acidification, our kids and grandkids cannot have the kind of future that we had; they can count on a future of high risk, both directly from climate change and, perhaaps, from a regional collapse of civilization.
People take sensible precautions when the risk is high. Ask a roomful of people if they have fire insurance. Almost all will raise a hand. Ask how many have had a fire in the last ten years, and almost none will respond. Yet people pay for insurance because, should a fire happen, they could lose everything—and still have to pay off the mortgage.
But uncertainty is another matter. Those with money to loan will worry about ever getting it back, and so loan rates will soar.
Ghostbusters, c. 1955
Sun Sep 30, 2007 at 07:39:58 PM PDT
The 1955 Spooklight Expedition was over a long November weekend; no adults, just 16-year-old guys out to solve a mystery. This 1997 Associated Press story explains the continuing attraction of the place:
HORNET, Mo. (AP) – On those moonless Missouri nights when it gets darker than dark – darker, some would say, than the inside of a cow – things can get pretty spooky along a rugged stretch of road. That’s when the Spooklight is likely to make its appearance. On some nights it might rise slowly out of nowhere to illuminate a broad swatch of farmland. On others it might simply waltz up East Highway 50 from Oklahoma, dancing across the gravel road that doubles as the state line.
Or it could just run straight at you, vanishing at the last second, then reappearing a heartbeat later, as it sneaks up from behind to levitate around your shoulders.
Whatever it is, just about everyone along this stretch of rolling hills and farms has a Spooklight story to tell.
Ad about Bush's inability to recognize mistakes
Mon Oct 11, 2004 at 01:22:56 PM PDT
Nice
new ad from Rob Reiner
THE ISSUES BEHIND THIS AD:
MISTAKES
Both during the press conference excerpted in Rob Reiner's ad "Mistake" and during last week's debate, President Bush was asked to name mistakes that he had made while in office. Tellingly, on both occasions, he was at a loss.
In his unwillingness to admit mistakes -- mistakes that are clear, even to many members of his own party -- Bush exposes one of his fundamental character flaws. Everyone, even the President of the United States, makes mistakes. But to admit mistakes, learn from them, and adjust accordingly takes courage and leadership. As Rob Reiner says in the ad "Mistake": Four years ago, a mistake was made. On November 2nd, we can correct that.
MoveOnPAC.org also has a nice suggestion:
Write a Letter to the Editor: Answer the Question Bush Can't
The most telling moment in Friday's Presidential debate came at the very end, when an audience member stood and asked the president to name three mistakes he's made while in office. Bush wouldn't or couldn't do it. The "mistakes" question captures one of the president's deepest character flaws: he'll stay the course even when we're headed off a cliff. The nationally televised moment on Friday night gives us a great opening to highlight some of the real mistakes that the president has made. Write a letter to the editor of your local paper and watch Rob Reiner's new ad, showcasing Bush's mistakes. If you haven't already, watch the clip from the first debate showing President Bush misleading the country and John Kerry taking him to task, and the one from the second debate showing Edwards setting the record straight.
Remember to cite an article in the very paper, such as an editorial.
Phrasemaking
Mon Oct 04, 2004 at 10:06:27 AM PDT
Phrasemaking is one weapon we have. We need ones for Get Out The Vote as well as for The Undecided.
Which phrase shall we saddle him with?
- If he were a CEO, he'd have been fired by now.
- If he were a coach, he'd have been fired by now.
- Pious Phrases may conceal Incompetence.
- Claiming "hard work" won't get Bush a passing grade.
- Patriots Need to Dump Bush
- If you believe Bush, then I've got a bridge that I'd like to sell you.
Lakoff's book on how to argue politics
Mon Oct 04, 2004 at 09:28:42 AM PDT
Do read
Lakoff's short book on how "framing" has been used by the likes of Karl Rove:
Do not use their language. Their language picks out a frame -- and it won't be the frame you want.
Let me give you an example. On the day that George W. Bush arrived in the White House, the phrase "tax relief" started coming out of the White House. It still is: It was used a number of times in this year's State of the Union address, and is showing up more and more in preelection speeches four years later. Think of the framing for relief. For there to be relief there must be an affliction, an afflicted party, and a reliever who removes the affliction and is therefore a hero. And if people try to stop the hero, those people are villains for trying to prevent relief.
When the word tax is added to relief, the result is a metaphor: Taxation is an affliction. And the person who takes it away is a hero, and anyone who tries to stop him is a bad guy. This is a frame. It is made up of ideas, like affliction and hero. The language that evokes the frame comes out of the White House, and it goes into press releases, goes to every radio station, every TV station, every newspaper. And soon the New York Times is using tax relief. And it is not only on Fox; it is on CNN, it is on NBC, it is on every station because it is "the president's tax-relief plan."
And soon the Democrats are using tax relief -- and shooting themselves in the foot.
-- George Lakoff, Don't Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate--The Essential Guide for Progressives
Friedman is back
Sun Oct 03, 2004 at 04:58:32 PM PDT
From
Sunday NYT:
Each time the Bush team had to choose between doing the right thing in the war on terrorism or siding with its political base and ideology, it chose its base and ideology. More troops or radically lower taxes? Lower taxes. Fire an evangelical Christian U.S. general who smears Islam in a speech while wearing the uniform of the U.S. Army or not fire him so as not to anger the Christian right? Don't fire him. Apologize to the U.N. for not finding the W.M.D., and then make the case for why our allies should still join us in Iraq to establish a decent government there? Don't apologize - for anything - because Karl Rove says the "base" won't like it. Impose a "Patriot Tax" of 50 cents a gallon on gasoline to help pay for the war, shrink the deficit and reduce the amount of oil we consume so we send less money to Saudi Arabia? Never. Just tell Americans to go on guzzling. Fire the secretary of defense for the abuses at Abu Ghraib, to show the world how seriously we take this outrage - or do nothing? Do nothing. Firing Mr. Rumsfeld might upset conservatives. Listen to the C.I.A.? Only when it can confirm your ideology. When it disagrees - impugn it or ignore it."